Monday, June 28, 2010

It doesn't seem like a big deal...Until they come for YOUR freedom...

Our state has instituted “sin taxes” on candy, and soda pop. Some states are trying to regulate fat content of foods, and children’s consumption of foods deemed to be “unhealthy”. The list of regulation grows...

I have to admit that it never bothered me that there are plenty of taxes on cigarettes and liquor – mostly because I don’t smoke, and rarely have an alcoholic drink. But when they come for my candy, my pop, my french fries – I find myself thinking, “Back off!”

The premise behind this is that certain items for consumption, and certain activities, are more likely to be harmful to you. Your use or participation will probably result in physical needs that are costly to meet. So – the powers-that-be seek to discourage your participation by making it more costly to you now, as well as mitigate, with your tax dollars, the future cost of your care.

Sounds reasonable, doesn’t it?

Until they come for your french fries...or your motorcycle rides...or your diet Coke...or your favorite restaurant’s menu...or your helicopter skiing excursion...or your daily latte...

Then it seems like they are taking away our freedom, and regulating us all to activities that are manageable for them. I don’t like it...and I’m pretty sure that the addicted-to-risk-taking generations that follow us won’t like it either. I just can’t picture Gen X or Y (what letter are we on now?) giving up snowboarding out-of-bounds (with their transponder, of course!)to maintain good standing with their government provided health-care. I’ve always taken encouragement from the fact that Gen Y’ers won’t put up with it, and it will be the death of the idea.

However, recently, the wise Walter Williams alerted me to the problem with the premise that sounds so reasonable.

He explained that while we look at these taxes and regulations as a failure of liberty, they are not. Instead, they are a failure of socialism. Socialism presumes that the government is responsible for our care, all of it. Whether we need our bank bailed out, our health care paid for, our environment cleaned of oil, our cribs made safe, our crop failures reimbursed (the list is endless) – it is the government’s responsibility.

Of course, the government can’t do it all – unless they manage the risks, unless they curtail our freedoms. The problem is not that we choose to participate in certain behaviors. The problem is that we participate in these behaviors, expecting someone else to cover the consequences if we can’t.

Anymore, I don’t take such comfort in the attitude of the Gen Y’ers risk-taking addiction. I suppose they figure that whatever happens to them, someone else will take care of it. It now seems obvious to me that we are a society that believes we have a right to good results...no matter what we do. From ambulance-chasing lawyers, to Congressional hearings about gas pedals, we expect that anything bad that happens to us should be fixed – by the government (or some big, deep-pocketed corporation the government took to the woodshed)!

We can engage in endless discussion of what should be regulated, and why, and how, and who should receive help, and who should be protected – a morass of moral relativism that threatens to swamp us all. In reality, the issue at its basis is simple: It’s not the government’s job to take care of us, to guarantee positive outcomes for all of our lives.

I wonder how our lives might be changed if we knew that our consequences were our own...that, truly, we would reap what we sowed...that if trouble came, we had to figure it out, not submit a form to the government for aid.

It could only improve the country, in my opinion. It might produce a new generation of innovators, and confident problem-solvers, instead of the whining, self-indulgent, and apathetic society we see too often these days.

It’s been a challenge to me, and I challenge you , to recognize where we have accepted the expectation that others should mitigate the consequences of our choices. It is a sneaky little assumption that creeps into our minds more readily than we realize.

And it needs to go!

7 comments:

  1. Well said. We need more personal accountability. I don't mind people who take risks and I want to drink my martinis in peace, but I also don't mind taking responsibility for it. I think it starts at home...we have to make our children aware of working for their dollars and taking responsibility for their actions and possessions...So much work, but so worth it.

    Thanks for always being thought provoking and well written.

    Hope to see you again soon!

    ReplyDelete
  2. As per usual more words than necessary:

    The question still remains when personal responsibility (what you are talking about) is superseded by something that prohibits the responsibility from being taken.

    Example-If you die in the process of screwing up and take a few people with you. Does your family, clan, city, county, country fill in the responsibility hole you have created? What does personal responsibility look like? Is it a fine? A punishment corporal or capital?

    The vikings had a system called were-geld (mans payment) that was a personal fine system. If you committed a crime you did not pay the village you paid the person-sort of like our civil system. The draw back to this was that if you had the money you could commit all the crimes you wanted. Why? Because wealth was a measure of responsibility for the vikings. If you were wealthy then you were considered more responsible than the less-wealthy. Of course one more death didn't matter as much as it does to us.

    At the other end you have the chinese. Their idea of responsibility is social. Confucianism dictates that a society is only as responsible as its worse criminal. If the people around you allow you to act irresponsible then it is they at fault not you. Social control rules chinese culture. They have very little patience for those that are irresponsible in their lifestyle. This is blown up to a macro level with their government. If it, as an extension of the people, allow for irresponsible citizens then a failure of society has occurred.

    So it is all fine and dandy to say we all need to be personally responsible. But we also have to recognize, as responsible people that our actions impact much more than just ourselves.

    A people may feel that a government is doing its duty when it protects its citizens from an inherent danger (such as criminal punishment), but feel that it is breaching personal responsibility when it says we know that it is bad for you and want you to live as a productive member of society not a drain.

    To that end I say, drive without your seatbelt, eat fat, play in traffic, take a walk off a short pier, jump off a cliff because all of your friends do it. But any of these actions immediately negate any social responsibility we have towards you. If you show up at the emergency room you wait until the real accidents have been helped. If someone strokes out and life insurance refuses to pay and their spouse looses their house and income, then they were irresponsible in marrying someone so irresponsible. The vikings would say "too bad shouldn't have married a fatty." The chinese would say they failed that person by allowing either the marriage or the persons gluttony to exist. Oddly in both cases the person affected would still be up the creek.

    The problem with personal responsibility is that it assumes that every man is an island. Yet we never bother to define our shores.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Troy -- You're making me think I SHOULD have gone to college. I enjoy reading your comments, and thinking...

    So kind of you to respond in kind...verbosity!

    ReplyDelete
  4. No one needs to go to college to think. The world around us is an education. You just need to be prepared to listen, understand (or try too, that is the hardest part for me), and be prepared to admit when I am wrong or perhaps need a little more info. Question everyones references. Test their hypothesis' when you can. Why? Cause we are all human and fallible. No matter how practically perfect (such as me!) The point is you are a step ahead of 99% of the people out there.

    ReplyDelete
  5. We've been talking a lot around here about consequences from our choices - and how our consequences affect so many besides ourselves. This younger generation (many of them anyway) are not so eager to say they should have to have consequences if they didn't really know ahead of time what those consequences would be
    !!!!????? You can tell that mama has been spending a lot of time on her soap box - oh yeah, and a lot of money on taxes - I do love my diet coke w/lime and candy!!! :-)

    ReplyDelete